Roggermoser v. Niles
This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 19 (Roggermoser v. Niles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alienation of affection. Verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff moves for a new trial, claiming that the verdict is against the evidence.
The plaintiff succeeded in raising a mere doubt as to the propriety of conduct between the defendant and Mrs. Roggermoser if one were inclined to [20]*20be suspicious. The testimony does not warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A mother of eight children, ranging in age from 20 to 6 years, should not be condemned upon conjecture, especially when the father is proven indolent, intemperate and inconsiderate. The jury’s verdict is just.
Motion for new trial denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 R.I. Dec. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roggermoser-v-niles-risuperct-1932.