Roggermoser v. Niles

9 R.I. Dec. 19
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 18, 1932
DocketNo. 84582
StatusPublished

This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 19 (Roggermoser v. Niles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roggermoser v. Niles, 9 R.I. Dec. 19 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

CAPOTOSTO, J.

Alienation of affection. Verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff moves for a new trial, claiming that the verdict is against the evidence.

The plaintiff succeeded in raising a mere doubt as to the propriety of conduct between the defendant and Mrs. Roggermoser if one were inclined to [20]*20be suspicious. The testimony does not warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A mother of eight children, ranging in age from 20 to 6 years, should not be condemned upon conjecture, especially when the father is proven indolent, intemperate and inconsiderate. The jury’s verdict is just.

Plaintiff’s attorney: Howard K. Simmons. Defendant’s attorneys: Messrs. Gilmartin & Toole.

Motion for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 R.I. Dec. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roggermoser-v-niles-risuperct-1932.