Roggenburg v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.

158 A.D.2d 332, 551 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1224
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Questions of fact exist as to the title ownership of the premises. Plaintiff has established that, at one time, the premises were owned by a corporation named Rockefeller Center, Inc. While the present defendant denies that it is the same corporation, no evidence has been adduced regarding whether a corporate entity of the same name existed in the past or whether the present defendant is related to a prior corporation of the same name. Under these circumstances, the motion was properly denied. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roggenburg v. Rockefeller Center, Inc., 158 A.D.2d 332, 551 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 332 (Roggenburg v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austrian Lance & Stewart, P. C. v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.
163 A.D.2d 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)