Rogers Vs. Dist. Ct. (Corwin)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 2020
Docket79935
StatusPublished

This text of Rogers Vs. Dist. Ct. (Corwin) (Rogers Vs. Dist. Ct. (Corwin)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers Vs. Dist. Ct. (Corwin), (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHRISTOPHER GREGORY ROGERS, No. 79935 AN INDIVIDUAL; AND ROGERS HOLDINGS, II, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and LORENIA CORWIN; ASHLEY FISH; STEFANIE KNIGHT; AND CHOLE THOMSON, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rule applies here. Int? Game

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 566, 558-59 (2008). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

Plek24 , C.J. Pickering

J. Gibb

, Sr. J. Douglas

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Zimmerman Law Firm, P.C. Lawrence J. Semenza Eighth District Court Clerk

'The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rogers Vs. Dist. Ct. (Corwin), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-vs-dist-ct-corwin-nev-2020.