Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

726 A.2d 258, 158 N.J. 11, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 264
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 7, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 726 A.2d 258 (Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 726 A.2d 258, 158 N.J. 11, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 309 N.J.Super. 630, 707 A.2d 1090 (1998).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S & S v. Zoning Bd. for Stratford
862 A.2d 1204 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Board of Adjustment
744 A.2d 1169 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
726 A.2d 258, 158 N.J. 11, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-zoning-board-of-adjustment-nj-1999.