Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
726 A.2d 258, 158 N.J. 11, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 309 N.J.Super. 630, 707 A.2d 1090 (1998).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 726 A.2d 258, 158 N.J. 11, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1999).
726 A.2d 258 (Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
S & S v. Zoning Bd. for Stratford
862 A.2d 1204 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Board of Adjustment
744 A.2d 1169 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)