Rogers v. Wittenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rogers v. Wittenstein

13 A.D.2d 520, 215 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 520 (Rogers v. Wittenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Wittenstein, 13 A.D.2d 520, 215 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, an action now pending in the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, by the female petitioner to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her in an automobile accident, and by the male petitioner, her husband, to recover damages for medical expenses and loss of services, the defendant in said action appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 10, 1960, granting petitioners’ application for such removal and for leave to amend the complaint so as to allege $100,000 damages for the wife, and $10,000 damages for the husband. The granting of the application was upon condition that the wife submit to a further physical examination by a physician of defendant’s choosing, if defendant so desire. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, an action now pending in the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, by the female petitioner to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her in an automobile accident, and by the male petitioner, her husband, to recover damages for medical expenses and loss of services, the defendant in said action appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 10, 1960, granting petitioners’ application for such removal and for leave to amend the complaint so as to allege $100,000 damages for the wife, and $10,000 damages for the husband. The granting of the application was upon condition that the wife submit to a further physical examination by a physician of defendant’s choosing, if defendant so desire. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 520, 215 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-wittenstein-nyappdiv-1961.