Rogers v. Willard
This text of 453 So. 2d 1175 (Rogers v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the directed verdict entered in favor of the defendant upon a finding that the plaintiff had at least made out a prima facie case for recovery of a debt on a simple contract. See Locke v. Aetna Acceptance Corp., 309 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See generally 6 Fla.Jur.2d Bills and Notes § 21. We further hold that the court erred in finding the instrument nonnegotiable because it was payable out of “restaurant earnings.” Payment was not conditioned to be made only out of that source. § 673.105(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1975); Wright v. Board of Public Instruction for County of Sumter, 77 So.2d 435, 437 (Fla.1955); Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County, N.A. v. Regency Highland Condominium Association, 452 So.2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 So. 2d 1175, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 517, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1730, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-willard-fladistctapp-1984.