Rogers v. Warden, Nevada State Prison

445 P.2d 28, 84 Nev. 539, 1968 Nev. LEXIS 404
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 1968·No. 5578·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*540 OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a post-conviction application for relief. The petitioner, William Rogers, was convicted of robbery and is presently serving his sentence at the Nevada State Prison. His post-conviction application does not challenge the validity of his conviction. Instead it asserts that he was brutally beaten by the Warden of the Nevada State Prison in violation of federal and state constitutional provisions forbidding cruel and unusual punishments. 1 He therefore seeks release from prison or other appropriate relief. The district court dismissed the petition on the ground that neither habeas corpus [NRS 34.360-34.680] nor the 1967 post-conviction remedy act [NRS 177.315-177.385] is available in these circumstances. We agree since those remedies provide for inquiry into the legality of imprisonment rather than supervision of prison administration. 2

Some courts have extended the scope of habeas corpus to embrace an Eighth Amendment violation occurring during confinement following a valid conviction. Coffin v. Reichard, 143 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1944); State ex rel. Cole v. Tahash, 129 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1964); In re Riddle, 372 P.2d 304 (Cal. *541 1962). We do not choose to do so, since the post-conviction remedies of chs. 34 and 177 do not contemplate relief for conduct or occurrences unrelated to the validity of the conviction, sentence, or restraint. Other redress is available to the petitioner if his charges are true. See Comment, Enforcement of Prison Discipline and Its Effect Upon the Constitutional Rights of Those Imprisoned, 8 Vill.L.Rev. 379, 388 (1963).

Affirmed.

Collins, Zenoff, Batjer, and Mowbray, JJ., concur.
1

tev. Const, art. 1, § 6; U.S. Const, amend. VIII. The Eighth Amendment is binding upon the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).

2

See Marshall v. Warden, 83 Nev. 442, 434 P.2d 437 (1967); Krause v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 459, 421 P.2d 949 (1966); Bundrant v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 388, 419 P.2d 293 (1966); Orsborn v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 300, 417 P.2d 148 (1966); Messmore v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 153, 413 P.2d 306 (1966); Morford v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 79, 411 P.2d 122 (1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Warden, Nevada State Prison, 445 P.2d 28, 84 Nev. 539, 1968 Nev. LEXIS 404 (Neb. 1968).

445 P.2d 28 (Rogers v. Warden, Nevada State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. Warden of Nevada State Prison
686 P.2d 250 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)
Director, Nevada Department of Prisons v. Arndt
640 P.2d 1318 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1982)
Ziegler v. Miliken
583 P.2d 1175 (Utah Supreme Court, 1978)
Bishop v. Sheriff
498 P.2d 1340 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1972)