Rogers v. Vosburgh

4 Johns. Ch. 84, 1819 N.Y. LEXIS 174, 1819 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 26
New York Court of Chancery·Decided August 5, 1819·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The following order, putting the party to his election, was entered:

“ Ordered, that the motion for dissolving the injunction be denied, and that the plaintiff, within eight days after notice of this decretal order, elect whether he will proceed at law under the said judgment, or in this Court, in this suit; and that if he elects to proceed at law, the bill shall thereafter stand dismissed with costs; and if he elects to proceed here, it is then further ordered, that he proceed no further [85]*85by execution, or otherwise, on the judgment) withotit the leave of this Court first had and obtained,” &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Vosburgh, 4 Johns. Ch. 84, 1819 N.Y. LEXIS 174, 1819 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 26 (N.Y. 1819).

4 Johns. Ch. 84 (Rogers v. Vosburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. Courtenay
49 A. 614 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1901)
Jenks v. Smith
14 R.I. 634 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Central Railroad v. N. J. West Line Railroad
32 N.J. Eq. 67 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1880)
Franklin v. Hersch
3 Tenn. Ch. R. 467 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1877)
Connihan v. Thompson
111 Mass. 270 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Bradford v. Williams
2 Md. Ch. 1 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1849)
Planters & Merchants' Bank of Mobile v. Walker
7 Ala. 926 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Blanchard v. Stone
16 Vt. 234 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)