Rogers v. Village of Port Chester
195 A.D. 900
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1921
StatusPublished
This text of 195 A.D. 900 (Rogers v. Village of Port Chester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rogers v. Village of Port Chester, 195 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the preliminary notice was sufficient under the authority of Sheehy v. City of New York (160 N. Y. 139) and Sweeney v. City of New York (225 id. 271). Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sheehy v. . City of New York
54 N.E. 749 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
195 A.D. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-village-of-port-chester-nyappdiv-1921.