Rogers v. Vancamp

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 21, 2004
• Docket: 04-6436
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6436

RONALD ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES R. VANCAMP; J. KIRK OSBORN; AMOS G. TYNDALL; MICHAEL E. BEALE, Judge; STAPLES HUGHES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-1111-1)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ronald Rogers appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Vancamp, No. CA-03-

1111-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -