Rogers v. United States
This text of Rogers v. United States (Rogers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1417
BRENDA A. ROGERS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00400-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda A. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Edward C. Tompsett, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brenda A. Rogers appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as untimely her complaint seeking judicial review of
the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in
denying her applications for benefits. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Rogers v.
Commissioner of Soc. Sec., No. 2:08-cv-00400-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va.
March 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rogers v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-united-states-ca4-2009.