Rogers v. United States

332 F. App'x 848
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2009·No. No. 09-1417·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brenda A. Rogers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely her complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in denying her applications for benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rogers v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec., No. 2:08-cv-00400-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. March 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. United States, 332 F. App'x 848 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 848 (Rogers v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.