Rogers v. United States

699 F. App'x 901
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 2017
DocketNo. 17-10219 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 901 (Rogers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. United States, 699 F. App'x 901 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Rogers appeals the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Rogers, whose sentence for possession of a firearm as a felon was enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), sought relief on the ground that his prior conviction in a Georgia court for robbery by intimidation did not qualify as a violent felony in the wake of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). But Rogers does not challenge the finding that his robbery conviction qualified as a violent felony. And Rogers concedes, as he did in the district court, that he has a prior conviction for aggravated battery that qualifies as a violent felony under the elements clause, which “with his two serious drug predicates” makes him “an armed career criminal.” Because Rogers is not entitled to relief from his sentence, we affirm the denial of his motion to vacate.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. United States
576 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-united-states-ca11-2017.