Rogers v. U-Haul Co.

41 A.D.2d 835, 341 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. U-Haul Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 A.D.2d 834

Opinion

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 7, 1972, on the ground [836]*836that the filed record on appeal includes an affidavit which was not considered by Special Term. The order, made on a rehearing of appellant’s motion for summary judgment, adhered to the original determination, embodied in an order dated November 1, 1971, denying the motion for summary judgment. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, in the exercise of discretion, since the inclusion of the affidavit in question was not prejudicial, its content having in material substance appeared in another affidavit which was considered by Special Term on the motion for summary judgment which was decided by the order dated November 1, 1971. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. U-Haul Co., 41 A.D.2d 835, 341 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 835 (Rogers v. U-Haul Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.