Rogers v. Turner
This text of 53 P. 663 (Rogers v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action to foreclose two real estate mortgages, and the defendant has appealed from a judgment against him for a deficiency remaining after the sale of the mortgaged premises. The sole ground of the appeal is that the complaint did not ask for a deficiency judgment nor any relief other than the foreclosure of the mortgages, but this contention is not sustained by the record as to one of the mortgages, being the one upon which the deficiency judgment was in effect rendered. As to this mortgage the plaintiff prayed for judgment against the defendant for the sum secured and also further asked that the mortgage be foreclosed and the premises sold and the proceeds applied upon the mortgage, and prayed for general relief. The decree contained a judgment against defendant for the amount due on this mortgage debt in accordance with the prayer and further provided-that execution should issue for any part thereof which might remain unpaid after the sale of the mortgaged property, and the proper application of the proceeds. We think this [400]*400judgment was clearly authorized under the complaint and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 P. 663, 19 Wash. 399, 1898 Wash. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-turner-wash-1898.