Rogers v. Tift

17 Johns. 267
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 Johns. 267 (Rogers v. Tift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Tift, 17 Johns. 267 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This being a feigned issue directed by the court, to ascertain the truth of facts, for its own information, each party is to be deemed an actor; there can, therefore, be no nonsuit for not proceeding to trial.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Springfield v. Hickox
7 Ill. 241 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1845)
Posey v. Underwood
19 S.C.L. 262 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1833)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Johns. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-tift-nysupct-1820.