Rogers v. Taintor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rogers v. Taintor

89 S.E.2d 165, 211 Ga. 805, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 472

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 12, 1955

Docket19029

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 165 (Rogers v. Taintor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Taintor, 89 S.E.2d 165, 211 Ga. 805, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 472 (Ga. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The petition in the present case does not seek the appointment of a receiver, or any other equitable relief, as was true in Rogers v. Taintor, 199 Ga. 192 (33 S. E. 2d 708). The allegations and the prayers demonstrate that this is an action at law, and is not an equity case within the provisions of the Constitution, art. VI, sec. II, par. IV (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Robinson v. Lindsey, 184 Ga. 684 (192 S. E. 910); Atlanta Finance Co. v. Fitzgerald, 189 Ga. 121 (5 S. E. 2d 242); White v. Georgia Railroad &.c. Co., 197 Ga. 238 (28 S. E. 2d 858).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Reyman & Abram, Charles F. Wittenstein, for plaintiff in error. Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

The petition in the present case does not seek the appointment of a receiver, or any other equitable relief, as was true in Rogers v. Taintor, 199 Ga. 192 (33 S. E. 2d 708). The allegations and the prayers demonstrate that this is an action at law, and is not an equity case within the provisions of the Constitution, art. VI, sec. II, par. IV (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Robinson v. Lindsey, 184 Ga. 684 (192 S. E. 910); Atlanta Finance Co. v. Fitzgerald, 189 Ga. 121 (5 S. E. 2d 242); White v. Georgia Railroad &.c. Co., 197 Ga. 238 (28 S. E. 2d 858).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Reyman & Abram, Charles F. Wittenstein, for plaintiff in error. Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 165, 211 Ga. 805, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-taintor-ga-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack