Rogers v. Taintor

89 S.E.2d 165, 211 Ga. 805, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 472
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 12, 1955·No. 19029·Published

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The petition in the present case does not seek the appointment of a receiver, or any other equitable relief, as was true in Rogers v. Taintor, 199 Ga. 192 (33 S. E. 2d 708). The allegations and the prayers demonstrate that this is an action at law, and is not an equity case within the provisions of the Constitution, art. VI, sec. II, par. IV (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Robinson v. Lindsey, 184 Ga. 684 (192 S. E. 910); Atlanta Finance Co. v. Fitzgerald, 189 Ga. 121 (5 S. E. 2d 242); White v. Georgia Railroad &.c. Co., 197 Ga. 238 (28 S. E. 2d 858).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Reyman & Abram, Charles F. Wittenstein, for plaintiff in error. Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Taintor, 89 S.E.2d 165, 211 Ga. 805, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 472 (Ga. 1955).

89 S.E.2d 165 (Rogers v. Taintor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Taintor
33 S.E.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
White v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.
28 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Atlanta Finance Company v. Fitzgerald
5 S.E.2d 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Burress v. Montgomery
97 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Robinson v. Lindsey
192 S.E. 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)