Rogers v. Stripling

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rogers v. Stripling

107 S.E. 273, 27 Ga. App. 33

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1921

Docket12235

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 273 (Rogers v. Stripling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Stripling, 107 S.E. 273, 27 Ga. App. 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

This ease is here upon-the general assignment of error, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. There is ample evidence to support [34]*34the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided May 11, 1921.

Appeal; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. January 11, 1921.

E. C. Collins, for plaintiffs in error. A. S. Way, Elders & DeLoach, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI