Rogers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rogers v. State

1931 OK CR 180, 298 P. 302, 50 Okla. Crim. 348, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 11, 1931

DocketNo. A-7845.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 180 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 1931 OK CR 180, 298 P. 302, 50 Okla. Crim. 348, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

*349 DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Greer county of selling intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of |250 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in March, 1930, and the appeal was lodged in this court in May, 1930. No brief in support of the appeal has been filed. Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed and no appearance for oral argument made, •this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

The case is affirmed.

CHAPPELL, J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*349 DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Greer county of selling intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of |250 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in March, 1930, and the appeal was lodged in this court in May, 1930. No brief in support of the appeal has been filed. Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed and no appearance for oral argument made, •this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

The case is affirmed.

CHAPPELL, J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent, not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 180, 298 P. 302, 50 Okla. Crim. 348, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.