Rogers v. State
This text of 2022 ND 50 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 17, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 50
Mark Allen Rogers, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20210260
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Christopher W. Nelson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for respondent and appellee. Rogers v. State No. 20210260
[¶1] Mark Allen Rogers appeals from a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Rogers sought to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming his trial counsel was ineffective and there was an insufficient factual basis for his guilty plea. The court denied Rogers’ petition for postconviction relief. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Rogers failed to meet his burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying Rogers’ petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Norman G. Anderson, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Norman G. Anderson, S.J., sitting in place of McEvers, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 50, 971 N.W.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-nd-2022.