Rogers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rogers v. State

83 S.W.3d 65, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2002 WL 1472093

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 9, 2002

DocketNo. ED 80179

StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.W.3d 65 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 83 S.W.3d 65, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2002 WL 1472093 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Leonard Rogers, appeals pro se from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Movant’s motion to take judicial notice of point relied on and second request to take judicial notice are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Leonard Rogers, appeals pro se from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Movant’s motion to take judicial notice of point relied on and second request to take judicial notice are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 S.W.3d 65, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2002 WL 1472093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-moctapp-2002.