Rogers v. State

15 N.E.2d 86, 214 Ind. 705, 1938 Ind. LEXIS 237
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 Ind. 593
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 1938·No. No. 27,008.·Published

Opinion

Tremain, J.

—The lower court denied appellant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The sole ground relied upon for reversal is that the jury commissioners, who drew the grand jury, were not duly qualified for the reason that they, and each of them, did not qualify by taking an oath to support the Federal and State Constitutions.

The precise question here presented was decided adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent decision in Steinbarger v. State, ante 36, and Foreman v. State, ante 79.

Upon authority of these decisions the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 15 N.E.2d 86, 214 Ind. 705, 1938 Ind. LEXIS 237 (Ind. 1938).

15 N.E.2d 86 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.