Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rogers v. State

92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 751, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 347

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 21, 1917

Docket8599

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 230 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 751, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

One charged with carrying a pistol without a license may successfully defend by showing a license granted by the ordinary of the county of his residence, in accordance with the statute. Acts 1910, p. 134; Park’s Penal Code, §§ 348 (a), 348 (b), 348 (c). Where the evidence showed that the defendant owned property in Walton county, and moved to Tift county in the early part of 1916, and in March, 1916, while in Walton county, procured the required license, proof that subsequently and within three years from the date of the license issued by the ordinary of Walton county he carried a pistol in Tift county, openly and fully expressed to view, will not be held to show such union of act and intention as is sufficient to authorize his conviction on the charge of carrying a pistol without a license. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

One charged with carrying a pistol without a license may successfully defend by showing a license granted by the ordinary of the county of his residence, in accordance with the statute. Acts 1910, p. 134; Park’s Penal Code, §§ 348 (a), 348 (b), 348 (c). Where the evidence showed that the defendant owned property in Walton county, and moved to Tift county in the early part of 1916, and in March, 1916, while in Walton county, procured the required license, proof that subsequently and within three years from the date of the license issued by the ordinary of Walton county he carried a pistol in Tift county, openly and fully expressed to view, will not be held to show such union of act and intention as is sufficient to authorize his conviction on the charge of carrying a pistol without a license. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 751, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-gactapp-1917.