Rogers v. State

62 S.E. 96, 4 Ga. App. 691, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 509
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 4, 1908·No. 1175·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The assignment of error based on the ruling of the trial court in admitting incriminating evidence obtained by a search of the defendant’s house without a warrant is controlled by the decisions of this court in the eases of Glover v. State, ante, 455 (61 S. E. 862), Croy v. State, ante, 456 (61 S. E. 862), Tooke v. State, ante, 495 (61 S. E. 917), and the decision of the Supreme Court in Williams v. State, 100 Ga. 511 (28 S. E. 624, 39 L. R. A. 269).

2. The verdict is fully supported by the evidence, and the, judgment refusing a new trial is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 62 S.E. 96, 4 Ga. App. 691, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 509 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

62 S.E. 96 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
93 So. 293 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Banks v. State
93 So. 293 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)
Heimer v. State
85 S.E. 821 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Warren v. State
64 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)