Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rogers v. State

159 S.E.2d 74, 223 Ga. 850, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 983

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 4, 1968

Docket24394

StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E.2d 74 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 159 S.E.2d 74, 223 Ga. 850, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 983 (Ga. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Frankum, Justice.

The appeal in this case is from the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial which was filed after his conviction of the offense of assault with intent to murder. It appears from an examination of the motion and from an examination of the enumeration of errors in this case and from a comparison of those papers in this case with the motion for a new trial and the enumeration of errors in Woods v. State, 223 Ga. 754, that no substantial difference exists between the questions presented by the appeal here and the questions presented by the appeal there. The ruling and judgment in that case is, therefore, controlling here, and there being no basis to confer jurisdiction of this case upon this court, the case is accordingly

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankum, Justice.

The appeal in this case is from the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial which was filed after his conviction of the offense of assault with intent to murder. It appears from an examination of the motion and from an examination of the enumeration of errors in this case and from a comparison of those papers in this case with the motion for a new trial and the enumeration of errors in Woods v. State, 223 Ga. 754, that no substantial difference exists between the questions presented by the appeal here and the questions presented by the appeal there. The ruling and judgment in that case is, therefore, controlling here, and there being no basis to confer jurisdiction of this case upon this court, the case is accordingly

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 S.E.2d 74, 223 Ga. 850, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-ga-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack