Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rogers v. State

29 S.E. 915, 103 Ga. 571, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 173

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 28, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, O. J.

There being no error of law complained of, there being evidence sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, his judgment in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. ,-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. September term, 1897.

L. F. McDonald, for plaintiff in- error. C. H. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, O. J.

There being no error of law complained of, there being evidence sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, his judgment in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. ,-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. September term, 1897.

L. F. McDonald, for plaintiff in- error. C. H. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Rogers v. State, 29 S.E. 915, 103 Ga. 571, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 173 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

29 S.E. 915 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related