Rogers v. State

29 S.E. 915, 103 Ga. 571, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 173
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 28, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 915 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. State, 29 S.E. 915, 103 Ga. 571, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 173 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Simmons, O. J.

There being no error of law complained of, there being evidence sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, his judgment in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. ,-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. September term, 1897. L. F. McDonald, for plaintiff in- error. C. H. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Warren
45 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 915, 103 Ga. 571, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-ga-1898.