Rogers v. State

107 So. 3d 1195, 2013 WL 615245, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5532
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2013·No. No. 3D13-159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., O’Neill v. State, 6 So.3d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Joseph v. State, 835 So.2d 1221, 1222 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (“The two-year limitation [in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)] is not tolled by other collateral proceedings filed in the trial court, even if a corrected sentence is entered.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 107 So. 3d 1195, 2013 WL 615245, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

107 So. 3d 1195 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schatz v. HASLUP
6 So. 3d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Joseph v. State
835 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)