Rogers v. State

652 So. 2d 471, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2980, 1995 WL 121499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 626 So. 2d 339
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 1995·No. No. 94-2178·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial by the trial court of his motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and seeks reversal of his habitual violent felony offender sentence and resentencing under the guidelines on the authority of State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993). While it is true that the use of a prior aggravated battery conviction for habitual offender sentencing was erroneous under Johnson, we find that the trial court nevertheless could have imposed the same sentence given appellant’s other prior conviction for aimed burglary.1 See, Rankin v. State, 620 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Since armed burglary is a permissible prior offense for a habitual violent felony offender sentence under Johnson, appellant’s sentence is not illegal, and, therefore, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s 3.800 motion.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 652 So. 2d 471, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2980, 1995 WL 121499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 471 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rankin v. State
620 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Johnson
616 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)