Rogers v. State
This text of 541 So. 2d 1365 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for drug trafficking and an order requiring appellant to pay court costs. Because appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the imposition of these costs it was error to impose them. Appellee concedes the error and suggests we reverse the order requiring the court costs payment.
The order for payment of court costs is reversed. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 So. 2d 1365, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2169, 1989 WL 41197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.