Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Rogers v. State

5 So. 2d 689, 148 Fla. 669, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 959

DecidedDecember 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 5 So. 2d 689 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 5 So. 2d 689, 148 Fla. 669, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 959 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Appellant was indicted for rape and was convicted of assault with intent to rape. His brief is pregnant with reasons why he should be relieved of the judgment imposed on him but the record is barren of proofs to support them. He contends that the evidence against him is unreasonable and insufficient but a jury of good and true countrymen did not agree with him. Neither do we. The question of the credibility of evidence is fruit out of season at the bar of this court.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant was indicted for rape and was convicted of assault with intent to rape. His brief is pregnant with reasons why he should be relieved of the judgment imposed on him but the record is barren of proofs to support them. He contends that the evidence against him is unreasonable and insufficient but a jury of good and true countrymen did not agree with him. Neither do we. The question of the credibility of evidence is fruit out of season at the bar of this court.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 So. 2d 689, 148 Fla. 669, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-fla-1941.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack