Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

728 N.E.2d 369, 88 Ohio St. 3d 546
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2000·No. No. 99-1602·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 728 N.E.2d 369, 88 Ohio St. 3d 546 (Ohio 2000).

728 N.E.2d 369 (Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related