Rogers v. State

4 So. 2d 266, 30 Ala. App. 226, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 119
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1941·No. 8 Div. 154.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SIMPSON, Judge.

Appellant is imprisoned under an indictment charging murder in the first degree. From an order denying his petition for bail this appeal is taken. Under .the rule in such cases he is presumed to be guilty in the highest degree and, to be entitled to bail as of right, must overcome this presumption by proof. State v. Gilbert, 20 Ala.App. 357, 102 So. 155, Deaver v. State, 24 Ala.App. 377, 135 So. 604; State ex rel. v. Lowe, 204 Ala. 288, 85 So. 707.

*227 The case must be tried before a jury so we forego a discussion of the evidence further than to say that with the presumption in favor of the indictment — and of the findings below — we will not disturb the action of the trial judge. The order denying bail is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 4 So. 2d 266, 30 Ala. App. 226, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 119 (Ala. Ct. App. 1941).

4 So. 2d 266 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: State of Alabama v. Mason John Grimes
Supreme Court of Alabama, 2026
Ex Parte Hall
844 So. 2d 571 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
Ex Parte Landers
690 So. 2d 537 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Price v. Bridges
255 So. 2d 57 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Perdue v. State
208 So. 2d 801 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Livingston v. State
116 So. 2d 396 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
Holmes v. State
102 So. 2d 673 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
Rogers v. State
4 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)