Rogers v. State

121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 5, 1929
Docket7 Div. 521.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 So. 925 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. State, 121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and sentenced to serve imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of from two to three years.

The indictment, trial, and conviction appear to be in all things regular. No exceptions, worthy of mention, if, indeed, there were any at all, were reserved on the taking of testimony. The oral charge of the court was unusually full, clear, and explicit. It properly placed before the jury every phase of the case, and in it the court was careful to give appellant the full benefit of every contention made by him from the evidence. There was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. State
121 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-state-alactapp-1929.