Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rogers v. State

45 So. 221, 154 Ala. 75, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 658

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 19, 1907

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 So. 221 (Rogers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. State, 45 So. 221, 154 Ala. 75, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 658 (Ala. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The affidavit on which the defendant was tried was sufficient in its designation of him by initials; his name being averred to be unknown to the affiant. The plea was not guilty, and there was no evidence adduced tending to refute the averment of the affidavit that his name was unknown.- — Winter v. State. 90 Ala. 637, 8 South. 556. There was testimony intro[77]*77duced upon which the court was warranted in adjudging him guilty.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Haralson and Anderson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI