Rogers v. State
45 So. 221, 154 Ala. 75, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 658
Opinion
The affidavit on which the defendant was tried was sufficient in its designation of him by initials; his name being averred to be unknown to the affiant. The plea was not guilty, and there was no evidence adduced tending to refute the averment of the affidavit that his name was unknown.- — Winter v. State. 90 Ala. 637, 8 South. 556. There was testimony intro[77] duced upon which the court was warranted in adjudging him guilty.
No error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. State, 45 So. 221, 154 Ala. 75, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 658 (Ala. 1907).
45 So. 221 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patton v. State
194 So. 425 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)