Rogers v. Skinner
This text of 251 A.D.2d 395 (Rogers v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated May 20, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment (see, Koch v Levenson, 225 AD2d 592; Williams v Econ, 221 AD2d 429; Wright v Morozinis, 220 AD2d 496; Greifer v Schneider, 215 AD2d 354; Cummins v Rose, 185 AD2d 839). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 395, 675 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-skinner-nyappdiv-1998.