Rogers v. Sewell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rogers v. Sewell

1933 OK 389, 23 P.2d 191, 164 Okla. 128, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 780

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 13, 1933

Docket21610

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1933 OK 389 (Rogers v. Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Sewell, 1933 OK 389, 23 P.2d 191, 164 Okla. 128, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 780 (Okla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed in this court August 13, 1930, and both sides brief the proposition involved in the appeal, but it now appears that Fannie Sewell died on the 30th day of November, 1931, in the state of California, and that the fact of the death of the said Fannie Sewell has" been known to the guardian ever since the date of her death.

There has been no action or application for revivor in the name of a personal representative of said Fannie Sewell, and this court has held in the case of City of Anadarko v. McKee, 89 Okla. 166, 214 P. 700, that this court is without jurisdiction to further consider proceedings in error unless it is so revived.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed in this court August 13, 1930, and both sides brief the proposition involved in the appeal, but it now appears that Fannie Sewell died on the 30th day of November, 1931, in the state of California, and that the fact of the death of the said Fannie Sewell has" been known to the guardian ever since the date of her death.

There has been no action or application for revivor in the name of a personal representative of said Fannie Sewell, and this court has held in the case of City of Anadarko v. McKee, 89 Okla. 166, 214 P. 700, that this court is without jurisdiction to further consider proceedings in error unless it is so revived.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1933 OK 389, 23 P.2d 191, 164 Okla. 128, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-sewell-okla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack