Rogers v. Salem Leasing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rogers v. Salem Leasing Corp.

881 So. 2d 728, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13642, 2004 WL 2047543

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 1D04-2794

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 881 So. 2d 728 (Rogers v. Salem Leasing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Salem Leasing Corp., 881 So. 2d 728, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13642, 2004 WL 2047543 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On July 2, 2004, the Court issued an order directing the appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as premature. As an initial matter, the appellants’ Motion to File Appellants’ Response to Order to Show Cause (7/2/04) Out of Time is granted and the response, filed on July 16, 2004, is hereby accepted as timely filed.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 2, 2004, the Court has determined that because the order on appeal merely grants the parties’ motions to enforce a settlement agreement, the order is not a final order. See generally Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The appellants’ motion for extension of time within which to file briefs, filed on August 18, 2004, is hereby denied.

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI