Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/Rogers v. Rogers

Rogers v. Rogers

181 Okla. 526
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 18, 1938
DocketNo 26967
StatusPublished

This text of 181 Okla. 526 (Rogers v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Rogers, 181 Okla. 526 (Okla. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On February 14, 1936, plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached in this court and on February 27, 1936, brief of plaintiff in error was filed.

The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Upon the authority of City of Oklahoma City v. Blondín, 163 Okla. 276, 21 P. (2d) 1053, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order entered denying an attorney fee and to allow an attorney fee in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, ,1.7., concur. DAVI-SON, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oklahoma City v. Blondin
1933 OK 304 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 Okla. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-rogers-okla-1938.