Rogers v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rogers v. Rogers

181 Okla. 526

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 18, 1938·No. No 26967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On February 14, 1936, plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached in this court and on February 27, 1936, brief of plaintiff in error was filed.

The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Upon the authority of City of Oklahoma City v. Blondín, 163 Okla. 276, 21 P. (2d) 1053, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order entered denying an attorney fee and to allow an attorney fee in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, ,1.7., concur. DAVI-SON, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On February 14, 1936, plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached in this court and on February 27, 1936, brief of plaintiff in error was filed.

The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Upon the authority of City of Oklahoma City v. Blondín, 163 Okla. 276, 21 P. (2d) 1053, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order entered denying an attorney fee and to allow an attorney fee in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, ,1.7., concur. DAVI-SON, J., absent.

Rogers v. Rogers, 181 Okla. 526 (Okla. 1938).

Pincite

181 Okla. 526 (Rogers v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related