Rogers v. Rogers
This text of 54 A.D. 195 (Rogers v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It may be that the affidavits objected to were not properly authenticated within the ruling of this court in Turtle v. Turtle (31 App. Div. 49). But that objection was not taken upon the hearing of the motion, and for that reason the defendant cannot avail himself of it here. The affidavits are sufficient to warrant the conclusion reached by the court below as to the right of the plaintiff [196]*196to alimony and counsel fees, and the motion, therefore, was properly granted.
The order should be affirmed, ' with ten dollars, costs and disbursements. ■ . ■ . .
Present —Van Brunt,- P. J., Rumsey, Ingraham, McLaughlin and Hatch, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D. 195, 66 N.Y.S. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-rogers-nyappdiv-1900.