Rogers v. Richmond

Supreme Court

Rogers v. Richmond

357 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 1365, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1361, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 824

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 16, 1958

Docket755, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by42 cases

This text of 357 U.S. 220 (Rogers v. Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Richmond, 357 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 1365, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1361, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 824 (1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We read the opinion of the Court of Appeals as holding that while the District Judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the State Court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. See Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443, 506, et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We read the opinion of the Court of Appeals as holding that while the District Judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the State Court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. See Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443, 506, et seq.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 U.S. 220, 78 S. Ct. 1365, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1361, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-richmond-scotus-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack