Rogers v. Renshaw
This text of 37 Tex. 625 (Rogers v. Renshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Renshaw and wife owned two hundred acres of land in Milam county, which was community property, and occupied the same as their homestead. In 1863, Renshaw sold the homestead, without the consent of his wife, as required by law, to appellants, Robert Rogers and wife. John Renshaw subsequently died, having acquired no other homestead, and the surviving wife brought this suit in the District Court, for tl^e establishment of her homestead rights. There was .a judgment below, setting aside the sale by Renshaw to Rogers and wife, and vesting the title to the same in the widow of John Renshaw, as her homestead; and the defendants below have appealed.
The Constitution and laws of this State absolutely forbid the alienation of the homestead by the husband, without the [626]*626consent of the wife, as provided by law. The sale by Benshaw was therefore an absolute nullity, and conveyed to appellants no rights whatever. And so far as appellants are concerned, it is wholly immaterial whether the surviving wife takes only a life estate, or a fee simple in the homestead, as they certainly acquired no-right to it under their deed. There is no error in the judgment of the District Court, and it is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Tex. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-renshaw-tex-1873.