Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region

893 N.E.2d 512, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1440
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2008
Docket2008-1234
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 893 N.E.2d 512 (Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region, 893 N.E.2d 512, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Certified Questions of State Law, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Nos. 06-4422 and 06-1423. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following questions:

1) Does R.C. 2919.123 mandate that physicians in Ohio who perform abortions using mifepristone do so in compliance with the forty-nine-day gestational limit described in the FDA approval letter?

2) Does R.C. 2919.123 mandate that physicians in Ohio who perform abortions using mifepristone do so in compliance with the treatment protocols and dosage indications described in the drug’s final printed labeling?

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Roger K. Evans and Helene K. Krasnoff by Jennifer L. Branch granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cordray v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region
2009 Ohio 2972 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
893 N.E.2d 512, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-planned-parenthood-cincinnati-region-ohio-2008.