Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.

127 N.W. 471, 26 S.D. 52, 1910 S.D. LEXIS 129
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1910·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

McCOY, J.

Whatever merit there may be in appellants’ contention is concealed beneath an avalanche of immaterial matter contained in 869 pages, termed “abstract,” which, with some little labor, might easily have been condensed within 100 pages. For all the reasons stated in Farrar v. Yankton Rand & Investment Co., 23 S. D. 525, 122 N. W. 585, and State v. McCallum, 23 S. D. 528, 122 N. W. 586, and a great many more of the same character, the court has not considered appellant’s abstract.

The judgment of the circuit court and the order denying a new trial are affirmed.

CORSON, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co., 127 N.W. 471, 26 S.D. 52, 1910 S.D. LEXIS 129 (S.D. 1910).

127 N.W. 471 (Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cochrane v. Nelson
189 N.W. 700 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
Boyd v. Kimball City Independent School District
158 N.W. 733 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Donahoe v. Adebar
149 N.W. 175 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)