Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District

Supreme Court of Florida

Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District

42 So. 2d 279, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 996

DecidedOctober 4, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 42 So. 2d 279 (Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District, 42 So. 2d 279, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 996 (Fla. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

The final decree appealed from recites that "this is a friendly test suit to determine whether or not the Drainage District has the authority to require the defendant landowner of the District to first obtain written consent of the Board of Supervisors of the District before he could connect his system of drainage with the works and improvements of the plan of drainage of the district."

The chancellor answered this question in the affirmative by enjoining appellant from connecting his drainage system with the canals of the appellee. Section 298.28, F.S.A. was the predicate for his decree.

The record has been examined and we think the chancellor construed the statute correctly so the final decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The final decree appealed from recites that "this is a friendly test suit to determine whether or not the Drainage District has the authority to require the defendant landowner of the District to first obtain written consent of the Board of Supervisors of the District before he could connect his system of drainage with the works and improvements of the plan of drainage of the district."

The chancellor answered this question in the affirmative by enjoining appellant from connecting his drainage system with the canals of the appellee. Section 298.28, F.S.A. was the predicate for his decree.

The record has been examined and we think the chancellor construed the statute correctly so the final decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 So. 2d 279, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-north-st-lucie-river-drainage-district-fla-1949.