Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District
Opinion
The final decree appealed from recites that "this is a friendly test suit to determine whether or not the Drainage District has the authority to require the defendant landowner of the District to first obtain written consent of the Board of Supervisors of the District before he could connect his system of drainage with the works and improvements of the plan of drainage of the district."
The chancellor answered this question in the affirmative by enjoining appellant from connecting his drainage system with the canals of the appellee. Section
The record has been examined and we think the chancellor construed the statute correctly so the final decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
42 So. 2d 279 (Rogers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.