Rogers v. National Cash Register Co.
This text of 75 S.E. 828 (Rogers v. National Cash Register Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no bona fide attempt to make a brief of the .evidence as required by law (the purported brief containing all the questions of counsel and the answers of witnesses in full, as' well as the rulings of the court in extenso, and including colloquies between the court and counsel), and all the assignments of error being dependent, for their determination, upon a consideration of the evidence, in accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court in Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (see, also, ante, 208, 213), the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 S.E. 828, 11 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-national-cash-register-co-gactapp-1912.