Rogers v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rogers v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

371 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 6029922, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1628

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 2011·No. No. WD 73830·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Rogers appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole on his petition seeking a declaration that he became eligible for parole on June 14, 2010, and a court order that he be released immediately on parole. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the [807] reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Rogers appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole on his petition seeking a declaration that he became eligible for parole on June 14, 2010, and a court order that he be released immediately on parole. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the [807] reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Rogers v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, 371 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 6029922, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

371 S.W.3d 806 (Rogers v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.