Rogers v. McKenna
124 A. 777, 96 N.J. Eq. 386, 11 Stock. 386, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 440
Opinion
The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Foster in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.
*Page 389For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. McKenna, 124 A. 777, 96 N.J. Eq. 386, 11 Stock. 386, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 440 (N.J. 1924).
124 A. 777 (Rogers v. McKenna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lodzinski
188 A. 681 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Bruen v. Spannhake
178 A. 73 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)