Rogers v. Mayers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rogers v. Mayers

59 S.E. 309, 3 Ga. App. 69, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 551

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 25, 1907

Docket493

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 309 (Rogers v. Mayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Mayers, 59 S.E. 309, 3 Ga. App. 69, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 551 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Noncompliance with Rule 15 of this court, relating to filing and service of briefs, is not a ground for' dismissal of a writ of error, but is a matter between the court and the offending attorney, on contempt proceedings.

2. Under the evidence in the record, the judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and in remanding the ease for a new trial under the instructions given.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. Noncompliance with Rule 15 of this court, relating to filing and service of briefs, is not a ground for' dismissal of a writ of error, but is a matter between the court and the offending attorney, on contempt proceedings.

2. Under the evidence in the record, the judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and in remanding the ease for a new trial under the instructions given.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 S.E. 309, 3 Ga. App. 69, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-mayers-gactapp-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack