Rogers v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

171 A.D. 912, 155 N.Y.S. 1137

This text of 171 A.D. 912 (Rogers v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 171 A.D. 912, 155 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to .$10,000; in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and McLaughlin, J., dissented and voted for reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 912, 155 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-knickerbocker-ice-co-nyappdiv-1915.