Rogers v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Florida

Rogers v. Kendall

43 Fla. 609

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1901·Published

Opinion

This was a suit in attachment brought by the plaintiff in error / against Robert H. Coleman. Subsequently Henry T. Kendall and The Pennsylvania Company for Insurance on Lives and Granting Anuities as Assignees, of Robert H. Coleman interposed claim to the property under attachment. There was judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff takes writ of error. The judgement is affirmed.

Decision Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a suit in attachment brought by the plaintiff in error / against Robert H. Coleman. Subsequently Henry T. Kendall and The Pennsylvania Company for Insurance on Lives and Granting Anuities as Assignees, of Robert H. Coleman interposed claim to the property under attachment. There was judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff takes writ of error. The judgement is affirmed.

Decision Per Curiam.

Rogers v. Kendall, 43 Fla. 609 (Fla. 1901).

Pincite

43 Fla. 609 (Rogers v. Kendall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.