Rogers v. Kemp

Opinion

ISTRIC ‘COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~RUBUSTA DIV. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Ob FER 12 PM 2: 29 £"> Cw 1 & DUBLIN DIVISION KENNETH ROGERS, ) ant a ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) CV 323-103 ) GOVERNOR KEMP; COMMISSIONER ) OLIVER; STAN SHEPARD; WARDEN ) WHITE; WARDEN JONES; WARDEN ) EMMONS; WARDEN EVANS; WARDEN __ ) MACFARLAND; and CAPTAIN KELLUM, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), and requests for injunctive relief, (doc. nos. 3-1, 3-2), DISMISSES this action without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this □□□ A Ny of February, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE